|
Chapter 3: Conscious Evolution and the
Evolution of Consciousness
"The replicating and evolving processes
that have been confined to the natural world
are about to become realms of human endeavor."
Bill Joy
"Why the Future Doesn't Need Us"
Wired 8.04 (2000)
"If at first the idea is not absurd,
then there is no hope for it."
Albert Einstein
Have you ever considered the
extraordinary speed at which we humans evolved from our initial
state of self-awareness to where we now possess the ability
to manipulate the genetic material of our own species? On
a cosmic time scale, the swiftness of this progression of
knowledge is unprecedented as far as we know. Along the way,
an important milestone on the road of biological evolution
has been passed, for no longer is organic life at the mercy
of evolution's previously glacier-like speed. We have entered
an era in which conscious awareness is taking over the machinery
of evolution, striving to improve the very species in which
this consciousness has taken root. No longer are changes in
our biology primarily dependent upon random mutation.
Almost daily, we hear of some
new advance in the science of genetics. The concepts of gene
splicing and cloning are entering mainstream awareness. Yet,
as important as it is to improve the biology of our species,
it is even more important that we accelerate the evolution
of consciousness itself. As technologically advanced as we
are, the human species has yet to attain a cohesive, global
view of itself, let alone arrive at an understanding of how
to manage the environment and resources required to sustain
the biological life we all hold so dear.
As Teilhard de Chardin tells
it, the story of evolution is a story of the struggle between
the unified multiple and the unorganized multitude. In other
words, evolution pits organization against individualization,
cell systems vs. large numbers of single cells, human organizations
against the great mass of individual human beings. Chardin
also postulated that self-aware consciousness evolves from
animal intelligence only after some critical mass of complexity
is reached in the brain/body organism supporting that intelligence.
In a way, this concept brings to mind a nuclear explosion,
which takes place when a critical mass of fissionable material
is brought together. In the case of self-awareness, however,
the energy released by a critical mass of complexity results
in consciousness rather than in an explosion.
As Chardin saw it, when an
essential amount of complexity is restricted to a small enough
space, the density of the information underlying that mass
of complexity is what creates self-awareness on the part of
the structure in which the complexity is contained. The only
case in which we know that this has likely occurred is in
the human species. As important as it may be to search for
other self-aware beings, both off this planet and among other
life forms found in our biosphere, it is equally important
to discover ways in which human consciousness can evolve to
a higher, more intensely self-aware level.
At what rate do you suppose
human biological evolution is taking place? My personal belief
is that the tempo of our evolution as a species is actually
accelerating. This is particularly evident if the rate at
which our increase in knowledge about life's processes is
taken into account. It took our species millions of years
to evolve from lower life forms to the point of self-awareness.
Yet it took only a few hundred years for these same self-reflective
beings to move from the discovery of the microscope to our
present age of gene splicing. Ever since that first moment
of self-awareness, the consciousness of our species has been
evolving at a stupendous rate when compared to other life
forms on Earth of which we are now aware. The significant
change in direction, or bifurcation,
the course of biological evolution took when self-awareness
entered the picture, also caused complexity to enter a new
era-one in which complexity itself is now increasing exponentially.
The Internet is an exemplary manifestation of this phenomenon.
An Evolutionary Bifurcation
If Chardin is correct in his
Law of Complexity and Consciousness (1)
we may be approaching a bifurcation along the road of human
evolution, a point at which complexity reaches yet another
critical mass. It is at this point we can expect to see a
new form of super-consciousness arise in the human species.
As organisms become ever more complex, conditions may become
favorable for consciousness to arise-that is, for one to know
it knows. Chardin extrapolated this observation into his hypothesis
that, eventually, the human species, en masse, will constitute,
or merge into, a single, symbiotic organism. He further envisioned
the noosphere itself becoming so incredibly complex that it
ultimately will become self-aware in its own right. What is
meant by the noosphere becoming self-aware is the question
that interests me the most.
When reading Teilhard de Chardin's description of the noosphere
as "a stupendous thinking machine," I am reminded
of the Internet/noosphere combination discussed in the previous
chapter. In a 1947 paper, Chardin said:
Complexification due to the growth of consciousness, or
consciousness the outcome of complexity: experimentally
the two terms are inseparable. Like related quantities that
vary simultaneously. Surely it is within this generalised
cosmic process that the noosphere, a particular and extreme
case, has its natural place and takes its shape. The maximum
of complication, represented by phyletic infolding, and
in consequence the maximum of consciousness emerging from
the system of individual brains, coordinated and mutually
supporting. (2)
[Emphasis added]
Chardin here implies that
for human consciousness to evolve to its utmost limits requires
a richer substrate than is to be found in an individual human
brain. He sees this further evolution of consciousness arising
from a "system of individual brains, coordinated and
mutually supporting," which, by definition, is significantly
more complex than any single human brain. Without knowing
exactly how such a system would come into being, it seems
clear that Chardin foresaw an interactive communications technology
like the Internet as a precondition to the further evolution
of human consciousness.
Keep in mind that Chardin's
work took place during the first half of the 20th century,
when radio and television were new technologies. It was through
these tools that he saw the promise of dynamic inter-human
communications taking place. What he did not foresee was that
democracy would pass these media by. How was he to know that
by the end of the 20th century the vast majority of the world's
television, radio, and print media would be controlled by
a mere handful of global corporations? Of course, with hindsight
it is now obvious that those in positions of power could not
let any form of mass communications fall under the control
of the public at large. As authoritarian governments the world
over have shown us time and again, control of information
must be absolute if they are to maintain control over any
knowledge which, if widely disseminated, would lead to a restructuring
of their power base. As early as 1990, Alvin Toffler pointed
out that:
Knowledge itself, therefore, turns out to be not only
the source of the highest-quality power, but also the most
important ingredient of force and wealth. Put differently,
knowledge has gone from being an adjunct of money power
and muscle power, to being their very essence. It is, in
fact, the ultimate amplifier. This is the key to the powershift
that lies ahead, and it explains why the battle for control
of knowledge and the means of communication is heating up
all over the world. (3)
If the growth of the noosphere
requires an increase in interpersonal communications by which
people can freely access and exchange information, the near-monopoly
control of our current mainstream media forces us to look
elsewhere for ways to bring an ever-increasing number of human
minds into closer contact with each other.
The Internet, of course, promises
a different outcome than we have seen with other forms of
mass media. Although, as it now may appear, corporate advertising
has taken over the Web, control of the Internet by a small
number of global companies is simply not possible as long
as enough of the Net's citizens remain vigilant. (4)
Consider the anarchical manner in which the infrastructure
of the Internet is managed. (5)
Because of the Net's lack of a single, central controlling
body, it is going to be very difficult for a small group of
corporations, or nations for that matter, to take over the
communications network of networks we call the Internet. If
the current egalitarian spirit of the Net continues to grow,
I see a very bright future ahead for freedom of information,
and the knowledge to which it leads. Of course, the freedom
of speech we see on the Net today is not guaranteed to continue
indefinitely. Our ability to continue to build an Internet
that does not restrict communications between individuals
might even depend on you. Like the butterfly of chaos theory,
whose fluttering wings cause an almost imperceptible disturbance
in the atmosphere, which in turn leads to a hurricane, the
future of this great venture we call the Internet might well
depend upon a single word, or act, or gesture from you. At
this delicate point in the space/time continuum, everyone's
actions become extremely important. This is certainly not
the time for you to have a casual attitude about the future
of human life on planet Earth.
It is important to understand
that by joining our minds together in pursuit of a common
goal, there will be not just an accumulation of ideas, but
rather a synthesis of ideas. Chardin makes it clear that this
is not to be a synthesis that creates some new autonomous
being, but rather one that will create a "domain of interwoven
consciousness, the site, support, and instrument of super-vision
and super-ideas." What is the Internet if not a domain
of interwoven consciousness, a habitat in which the human
species can nourish a unified, global vision of itself and
for itself? I believe the Internet provides a perfect focal
point for consciousness to continue its process of complexification,
as Chardin calls it. Of all the technological advances made
by the human species, the Internet provides the most fertile
ground yet in which the noosphere, our species-consciousness,
can take root and evolve to its next level of complexity.
A Working Definition of Consciousness
What follows is not intended
to be a universal definition of consciousness. It is only
included to provide the reader with a sense of what I mean
when I use the word "consciousness" in this book.
Specifically, I am referring
to the state of mind human beings find themselves in when
they are self-aware. This strict use of the word consciousness
does not include any forms of consciousness that may be experienced
after the human body dies, unless I specifically make a statement
to that effect. Thus, the type of consciousness is human in
form. This does not, however, tell us what consciousness actually
is. The short answer is that consciousness is a form of energy,
but this is too brief to be a very satisfying answer.
Another
way to conceptualize consciousness is to begin with its foundation,
the living human brain. As we all know, our bodies, which
include our brains, are kept alive by food. Although some
of our food may include animal protein, the food which underlies
all of animal life comes from plants. In turn, plants synthesize
water and carbonic acid into edible organic matter. Basic
chemistry teaches us that chemical synthesis requires an energy
source. In the case of plants, this energy comes from the
sun. Without the energy provided by our sun, life on this
planet would not exist. I will let Albert Hofmann tell the
rest of the story:
Light is the original cosmic energy source. All life,
the life of plants, animals, and human beings, is formed
and sustained by light. Even the thought process of the
human brain is fed by this energy source. Therefore the
human mind, our consciousness, represents the highest, most
sublime energetic transformation of light. We are light
beings; that is not only a mystical experience but scientific
knowledge as well. (6)
Light, of course, is a form
of energy; thus consciousness (in my view) is energy that
has taken human form; in other words, energy incarnate. (7)
Energy itself, therefore, is the underlying substance of all
that is, both material and spiritual. Whether or not this
assumption is correct, it provides a working metaphor to explain
such things as the contacts with other entities of which shamans
speak. Perhaps the entities they encounter on their deep shamanic
journeys are concentrated fields of energy composed of other
than human consciousness. I have heard more than one shaman
say of his work, "It is all about energy." Why energy
seeks form is something that is not yet clear, but this has
no bearing on the way in which I use the word "consciousness."
The Evolution of Consciousness
Until now, I have been using
the word "evolve" primarily in its general, non-biological
sense, that is to develop. My use of the word in this chapter
is also meant to carry with it the sense that, overall, the
development, or growth, of consciousness has been in an upward,
or more fulfilling direction. Using a biological metaphor
to describe the evolution of consciousness is not necessarily
inappropriate, since human consciousness is biologically grounded.
If we were to say that consciousness
itself fell under nature's processes of evolution, ideas would
be analogous to genes. Just as our genes determine our biological
makeup, our ideas shape our consciousness. Continuing with
this metaphor, we can see how, from time to time, mutant ideas
can alter the genetic makeup of our consciousness and cause
the emergence of a completely new state of mind.
I once witnessed a dramatic
demonstration of the power a single mutant idea can have over
an individual mind. You have most likely seen a similar demonstration.
It involves hypnotism. (8)
One evening I was in a nightclub that featured a hypnotist's
act. Although he went through a full range of startling presentations
of the power of hypnotism, what most captivated my attention
was the transformation that took place in a young woman from
the audience who responded to a post hypnotic suggestion she
had received.
Earlier, when this woman
was seated on the stage with other volunteers from the audience,
she was so unassuming as to be nearly invisible. In fact,
I was not even sure she had been hypnotized when she was told
that later, when the band began playing a particular tune,
she would become the embodiment of a then famous popular singer.
As we witnessed the other volunteers going through what seemed
to be super-human feats, no one paid any attention to the
young woman who had by then returned to her table. Eventually,
the band struck up the prearranged tune, and this woman, quite
literally, metamorphosed before our very eyes.
It is difficult to convey
the transformation of personality we witnessed that evening.
This previously shy and unassuming person suddenly had a radiance
about her that defied description. She not only came back
on stage singing in a clear and beautiful voice, she took
over the show. Until the hypnotist released that post hypnotic
suggestion from her mind, she was the show. I witnessed this
performance over 30 years ago, yet I can still recall everything
about the moment that young woman, under the influence of
a single mutant idea, actually became a different person.
Everything about her changed, not only her self-assuredness,
but even her physical appearance changed. Before our very
eyes, this woman transformed herself into the gorgeous, vibrant,
enchanting, and very talented being she had been hiding from
us when she first volunteered to be hypnotized. Her consciousness
encountered a mutated idea and out of it evolved a new person.
I will never forget that evening, for it was the first time
I actually understood the virtually unlimited power of mind.
It is this type of transformation
I envision when I speak of the evolution of consciousness.
As important as the daily growth and development of our consciousness
is, it is the mutations that I see as triggering an evolution
in consciousness. Granted, I am putting a positive spin on
the direction such mutations can cause. This does not mean
to imply that mutant ideas come only in pleasing flavors.
During the last century we certainly experienced many powerful
mutations in consciousness, some of which led to world wars.
It is my passionate hope that negative mutations such as these
can be avoided in the future as our species-mind becomes better
coordinated through the same self-organizing properties other
complex systems exhibit. (9)
Just as biological life has
evolved through mutation, trial, and error, consciousness
also seems to follow a similar trajectory. By now our species
should be convinced that ideas of war, hate, and social injustice
are negative mutant memes that should be studied in academic
institutions, not unleashed on the planet at large. Let us
take a new tack and see whether ideas that lead our collective
consciousness in the direction of Gaian awareness can provide
us a better chance of surviving.
The destruction of our biosphere
is not a new phenomenon. Our species has been pillaging the
environment for at least 14,000 years. Why? Because the collective
consciousness of our species has not yet evolved to the point
where it can take precedence over individual wills. Until
our species began to over-populate this planet, the biosphere
was able to absorb the negative effects of our misconduct.
Now that the only real threat of predators comes from within
our own species, the time has arrived to evolve new strategies
for survival. Each day more people come to the realization
that all life is actually interconnected, deeply interconnected.
With the aid of the Internet, it is now possible for our species
to bring our collective unconscious to the surface and more
closely examine what it means to be human and to share this
planet with so many other incredible forms of life. Viewed
from this perspective, it becomes even more imperative that
we do all that we can to ensure that everyone has access to
the Net. Internet access should be a basic human right, and
it is up to those who are already connected to see that this
right is extended to the rest of our species.
Conscious Evolution
As we know, the processes
of biological evolution appear to take place ever so slowly
and behind the scenes, so to speak. At least that has been
the case until our recent advances in the science of genetics.
It was not until the 20th century that we saw large-scale
efforts on the part of the human species to play an active
role in evolution. Although gene splicing, gene therapy, cloning
and other new technologies are still in their infancy, it
seems clear that there is no longer any possibility of turning
back and abandoning these new fields of research. Consciousness
has now taken its place alongside nature and joined in the
work of evolution.
While it may not yet be fashionable
to speak of genetic research in terms of consciously directing
evolution, it seems clear that this is precisely what is taking
place. The human species is now actively involved in the continuing
process of evolving not just itself, but other animals and
plants as well. Just as we breed farm animals with a certain
genetic predisposition, we also modify our food. For example:
The USDA has already approved about 50 genetically engineered
crops for unlimited release; US researchers have tested
about 4,500 more. Over half the soybeans and a third of
the corn [grown in the U.S.] now contain genes spliced in
from other forms of life. (10)
What concerns some people
who have given serious thought to our headlong rush into the
genetic manipulation of life is that many of our best scientists
are focused more on the economic value of their work than
on its meaning to all life on this planet. Scientists are
now purposively creating life forms primarily because they
are patentable, not because they may lead to an improvement
of life on this planet. If for no other reason than to keep
up with the exponential advances in the biological sciences,
it seems imperative that we also evolve our species' consciousness
to a much higher level. As respected computer scientist Bill
Joy so clearly states, "We should have learned a lesson
from the making of the first atomic bomb and the resulting
arms race. We didn't do well then, and the parallels to our
current situation are troubling." (11)
From this moment in time forward,
it is even more important that the pace of the evolution of
human consciousness dramatically increase if we are to match
the increased rate at which we have taken control of our biological
evolution.
We are talking apes who now
have the tools required to do everything from exploring the
atom to walking on the moon. Our skills in science and technology
are growing at an ever-increasing rate; yet when it comes
to inter-tribal relations among our species, we have not evolved
much above the level of our prehistoric ancestors. The time
has arrived for us to consciously direct the evolution of
human consciousness itself, before our technology and innate
selfishness drive our species to extinction. Fortunately,
we now have a very powerful tool to assist us in the conscious
evolution of human consciousness. We have the Internet.
With few exceptions, people
from all cultures share intimate bonds with their immediate
families and close friends. Even in families where there are
strong sibling rivalries, it is common for warring brothers
to come together to repel a threat to their family. The best
hope for us to survive as a species is to take the bond of
family to its highest level. The time has arrived for us to
clearly see that the entire human species is our family. But
how, you ask, are we to accomplish such a task? In the final
chapters, we will explore some of the possibilities evoked
by this question. First, let us take a closer look at this
strange cosmos in which human consciousness has come to evolve.
|
|